 |
| Amanda Knox |
The Prosecutor's appeal against the trial of Amanda Knox & Raffaele Sollecito went on the attack in Perugia, Italy, the court Saturday to try to differentiate the relationship of independent forensic experts who can put a couple of out of prison, the case that make headlines in the world.
Amanda Knox and Sollecito were caught in December 2009 and punished for 26 and 25 years respectively in 2007 for the bloody murder of Meredith Kercher, a very British student who shared an apartment with Knox in Perugia. Both deny wrongdoing and hope their punishment will be set aside in this appeal. A third person, Rudy Guede, was also convicted in another trial for his involvement in the murder and is serving a prison sentence of 16 years. She has exhausted her appeals.
Two experts - Carla and Stefano Conti vecchiotti - Perugia appeals court has requested a DNA test independently for critical components - the alleged murder weapon: a knife found in Sollecito's house and the closing of the throat of the victim is the room where you killed a British exchange student.
Monday Vecchiotti Conti and presented the report of 145 pages of the court and said they could not find enough DNA is two certificates were needed for the study. They also analyzed data from the first trial lawyers and investigators had found several glaring errors in the collection and interpretation of data is to say that it is contaminated.
Knox and Sollecito are now sitting in a dark courtyard and listen to the debate. At the first hearing, the judge read a letter he received from the Italian conductor Piero Angeloni forensic pathologist, which supported work experience, saying that the correct procedures followed by the police, leading all 4500 years Crime Scene Investigation.
The experts requested that some questions on defense Amanda Knox, the method of DNA and starch that independent experts had found the knife with a blade meets the handle - before they are questioned by the load.
Luciano Ghirga on behalf of his client, Amanda Knox, Vecchiotti asked whether the fact that the starch found the murder weapon, which means it does not wash. Vecchiotti said the knife "does not wash very well." The indictment in this case, has always maintained that the knife had been removed, possibly bleach, which is explained, they said that only a minority of the victim after DNA found on the blade .
Prosecutor Giuliano Mignini Manuela Comfortable, which borders the first trial, which began long ago, a systematic attempt to deny the allegations poor forensic work, and remove the expert's conclusions.
First, they asked everyone to list their skills and literature. They reeled off a long list of titles and publications, he greeted the fans with lace comfort in the face and smiled. Since then, she was asked to list their experience in legal matters, but a judge intervened and said that although he had much experience, they can still make mistakes. "Exactly," she says with satisfaction.
Amanda Knox and Sollecito were caught in December 2009 and punished for 26 and 25 years respectively in 2007 for the bloody murder of Meredith Kercher, a very British student who shared an apartment with Knox in Perugia. Both deny wrongdoing and hope their punishment will be set aside in this appeal. A third person, Rudy Guede, was also convicted in another trial for his involvement in the murder and is serving a prison sentence of 16 years. She has exhausted her appeals.
Two experts - Carla and Stefano Conti vecchiotti - Perugia appeals court has requested a DNA test independently for critical components - the alleged murder weapon: a knife found in Sollecito's house and the closing of the throat of the victim is the room where you killed a British exchange student.
Monday Vecchiotti Conti and presented the report of 145 pages of the court and said they could not find enough DNA is two certificates were needed for the study. They also analyzed data from the first trial lawyers and investigators had found several glaring errors in the collection and interpretation of data is to say that it is contaminated.
Knox and Sollecito are now sitting in a dark courtyard and listen to the debate. At the first hearing, the judge read a letter he received from the Italian conductor Piero Angeloni forensic pathologist, which supported work experience, saying that the correct procedures followed by the police, leading all 4500 years Crime Scene Investigation.
The experts requested that some questions on defense Amanda Knox, the method of DNA and starch that independent experts had found the knife with a blade meets the handle - before they are questioned by the load.
Luciano Ghirga on behalf of his client, Amanda Knox, Vecchiotti asked whether the fact that the starch found the murder weapon, which means it does not wash. Vecchiotti said the knife "does not wash very well." The indictment in this case, has always maintained that the knife had been removed, possibly bleach, which is explained, they said that only a minority of the victim after DNA found on the blade .
Prosecutor Giuliano Mignini Manuela Comfortable, which borders the first trial, which began long ago, a systematic attempt to deny the allegations poor forensic work, and remove the expert's conclusions.
First, they asked everyone to list their skills and literature. They reeled off a long list of titles and publications, he greeted the fans with lace comfort in the face and smiled. Since then, she was asked to list their experience in legal matters, but a judge intervened and said that although he had much experience, they can still make mistakes. "Exactly," she says with satisfaction.
